Book Reviews


Review
======

Title: Polygamy: Polygyny, Polyandry, and Polymory
Author: Daniel Young, Sarah Young, and Kate Young
Publisher: Fifth Estate (www.fifthestatepub.com)
Genre: Non-fiction
Year Published: 2013
Number of Pages: 218
Binding: Trade paperback
ISBN10: n/a
ISBN13: 9781936533367
Price: $19.95 ($14.96 at amazon.com)

Reviewed by Jeffrey Needle for the Association for Mormon Letters

Okay, true confessions time. I happened to glance at Fifth Estate’s
home page a few weeks ago and came away shaking my head, wondering how
this publisher had escaped my notice until now. Click on the Religion
and Theology tab under books and you’ll see what I mean. Although not
an LDS publisher, herein may be found a veritable treasure trove of
arcane and wonderful subjects. I was mesmerized as I surveyed this
publisher’s offerings.

Contacting the owner, Joseph Lumpkin, I discovered a very fine fellow
who was excited about having AML cover his offerings. I was
delighted! I quickly assigned several titles to our qualified
reviewers, but kept “Polygamy” to read for myself.

Now, the surname of the authors (Young) might lead some to think that
they are descendants of Brigham. But this does not appear to be the
case. The authors attend evangelical Christian churches, but have
found the plural marriage idea to be both workable and worthy of
closer attention. Let’s see how well they’ve done.

The first two pages had me hooked. Something I didn’t know — “The
fastest growing population practicing polygamous marriages is not
related to or based on religion. They are secular polygamists.” (p.
8) Startling! At least to me. Although I know several practitioners
of plural marriage, been in their homes and enjoyed meeting them
(including leadership of the Apostolic United Brethren), I don’t think
I’ve ever met a “secular polygamist.” How does this work? What is
their rationale for the practice?

Next comes a helpful summary of the various terms used in conjunction
with plural marriage — see the book’s title. The terms are sometimes
used interchangeably, and so I appreciated the authors’ nice summation
of the terminology. The idea of “group marriage” as mentioned here
can be unsettling, but it appears to be something of a growing
movement in an America that seems to be distancing itself from
“traditional marriage” — whatever that means!

Next is a brief look at marriage practices across the world religious
spectrum. Fascinating stuff here. Polygamy in Judaism? In Buddhism?
How does it work? The authors offer up some fascinating insights
into attitudes different religious traditions have had toward the
practice.

An extensive section follows that looks at how various poly-families
work. What are the dynamics of such relationships? How do the
families function in society? Gender roles play a big part here.
Studies done by anthropologists, and others cited in “Psychology
Today” and other behavioral science journals, are cited here to show
that researchers in the soft sciences have expressed interest in this
subject, creating some very interesting data on observed interplay
within these families. My oh my!

In just over two short pages, the subject of sex within poly homes is
explored. I don’t suppose there are any real rules here, but certain
norms seem to have evolved over the years. I’m guessing this can get
pretty edgy at times.

What follows is a glimpse at the logistics of poly-households. How do
finances work? How does one spouse share his/her time among the
families? How do they function within the larger society, a society
that is not sympathetic to their lifestyle? Having spent time with
polygamous families, I know the children are often uncomfortable with
having to hide their family structure from their friends. Fear of
discovery leads many to live virtually double lives. Very difficult
path, in my opinion.

A brief discussion of “Downfalls and Traps – The Undoing” looks at how
the whole enterprise can be spoiled from within. Financial and
emotional independence are essential if the relationship will survive,
the authors insist. These few pages are a virtual how-to guide for
those contemplating entering such a relationship.

How do different states view the subject of cohabitation? The authors
offer a helpful guide, state by state, to their rules and regulations.

I’m a bit ashamed of myself at this point, but the final section of
the book was the most enjoyable. I suspect it appeals a bit to the
voyeur in each of us. Titled “Celibacy,” it offers a perfectly
delightful view of the role sex has played in the history of the
Church (particularly Catholicism, and its somewhat spotted record when
it comes to randy Popes!). Here we have a virtual rogues gallery of
Church leaders whose baser instincts left a trail of disappointed
partners and troubled offspring. The authors even offer a list of
Popes who left behind progeny, calling into question the entire issue
of celibacy in the Roman Catholic priesthood.

Whenever I review a title from a publisher new to us, I like to make
some comments about the physical appearance of the book. In this
case, the volume appears to be well constructed, and should last many
years. No cheap paper or binding, as far as I can see. The body text
of the book has lines spaced further apart than what is normal. At
first, it was a bit disconcerting, but I soon acclimated myself to the
layout.

My only real critical comment has to do with what seems to be a lack
of professional editing. This is not unusual for small press titles.
I wish it were the practice of such enterprises to have a professional
editor have a look at a manuscript before going to press. To a
grammar nazi like myself, this can be a distraction. But, in the end,
it didn’t distract me from the fascinating discussion in this book.

“Polygamy” by Young, Young and Young is, in my view, a valuable
addition to the considerable corpus of literature on the subject of
plural marriage. So many solid historical treatments of the subject
have come our way, and each makes its own significant contribution to
the discussion. Scott Compton’s “In Sacred Loneliness” and Kofford
Books’ important 3-volume series “Joseph Smith’s Polygamy” — these
come to mind as deep, detailed studies.

Our current volume is different. It gives audiences, both religious
and secular, a chance to peek inside the world of polygamous marriage,
presenting it in simple, clear prose that informs and, at times,
amuses. In my view, the authors, and the publisher, have done the
public a great service by bringing this little book to life.

I think readers will enjoy this volume. While the typesetting and
editing problems can be a distraction, in the end, there is a
tremendous payoff for the determined reader. My thanks to the
publisher for making this review possible.

Jeffrey Needle
Association for Mormon Letters
jeff.needle@gmail.com
www.aml-online.org
www.LDSBookLovers.com/Needle.html

http://forums.mormonletters.org/yaf_postsm2639_Young-et-al-Polygamy-Polygyny-Polyandry-and-Polymory-reviewed-by-Jeffrey-Needle.aspx#2639



Reviews from Diglotting

A site for critical and scholarly reviews

The Books of Enoch: A Complete Volume (Click here to view on Diglotting)

The Book of Enoch: A Complete Volume by Joseph Lumpkin

The author, Joseph Lumpkin, has authored many books on the Old and New Testament pseudepigraphal writings. This book contains translations (with notes) on the three different books ascribed to Enoch.

For those unaware of what 1, 2, & 3 Enoch entail, here is a brief summary. The book of 1 Enoch is a collection of a handful of separate documents written over a period of about three centuries prior to Christ which were eventually collected together into one single work. It is also called “Ethiopic Enoch” due to it being extant in manuscripts written in Ethiopic preserved by the Ethiopian church, although it is now known from Greek manuscripts as well.

The book of 2 Enoch, also known as “Slavonic Enoch” or “Secrets of Enoch”, is preserved in Slavonic manuscripts, although last year fragments of it were found in Coptic manuscripts. It has been dated to both the start and the end of the first millennium, with quite a few scholars holding to an original composition from pre-70 AD that was later heavily interpolated by Christians.

3 Enoch, also called “Hebrew Enoch” or “Revelation of Metatron”, purports to have been written by Rabbi Ishmael in the second century, although it can only be traced back to the fifth century. The general gist of this book is about Enoch’s ascension to heaven and his subsequent transformation into Metatron.

The back cover of the book says “For the first time, the major books making up the Enochian literature are presented to the public in a single volume.” This is not quite true because I am aware of one other book which does contain all three books of Enoch, which is, James Charlesworth’s The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: Apocalyptic Literature and Testaments.

Lumpkin starts off this volume with an introductory chapter on Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and the books of Enoch in particular. There is also an extended introduction at the start of 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch which dives into more detail regarding the text, themes, etc. This book is quite a good way to get familiar with the books of Enoch. The translations used in this book for 1 & 2 Enoch are largely based off the translations of R.H. Charles and others, although Lumpkins has revised such things as sentence structure as well as the text itself (using recent information from commentaries and other sources). I think the translation of 3 Enoch is Lumpkins revised version of the original translation done by Dr. Odeberg in 1928.

Helpful comments are interspersed throughout the translations. Some are quotations of biblical books which the author feels are reminiscent to the text, others are explanations to clarify the text. Personally, I would have preferred the commentary to be placed in footnotes and it may have been more helpful to have included more comments explaining the text (the books of Enoch can be hard to follow if you do not have a commentary to help you along). Another thing that bothered me was that the type of text was different for each of the three books. The text of 1 Enoch was in bold, the text of 2 Enoch was not in bold, and the text of 3 Enoch was in a larger font than that of 1 & 2 Enoch.

All in all, it is still quite a good introductory book for the layman who wants the text of the three books of Enoch. It is definitely the most inexpensive book containing 1, 2, & 3 Enoch available.

***

The Book of Enoch – A Complete Reference & Guide (Click here to view on Diglotting)

The Book of Enoch: A Complete Guide and Reference by Joseph Lumpkin

The book of 1 Enoch (a.k.a. Ethiopic Enoch) is a collection of five main books and two short appendices which claim to be accounts from the Enoch. They were written at various times during the last few centuries B.C., as well as the first century A.D. It is quite an important non-canonical book to study as it contains a lot of information about traditions that developed in Judaism and presents a common worldview in second-Temple Judaism of apocalyptism, which considers the world to be full of wickedness and in imminent danger of divine judgment.

The translation of 1 Enoch that is used here is taken from the standard translations of R.H. Charles and Richard Laurence, but it is also supplemented by more recent information on the text of 1 Enoch, as well as making the text sound more like modern English instead of the 18th and 19th centuries.

Lumpkin provides a 25 page introduction to 1 Enoch, which ably shows the importance of 1 Enoch to biblical studies. The book of 1 Enoch had an influence on the New Testament authors and writings, though as to what extent is unknown. The New Testament epistle of Jude directly quotes from the first chapter of 1 Enoch. Throughout this book, Lumpkins provides a lot of quotations to New Testament texts which he feels offer evidence of possible influence by 1 Enoch, as well as quotations from the Old Testament which may have been used as sources by the authors of 1 Enoch. There are also other comments injected throughout the text of 1 Enoch to help explain confusing passages or to illuminate the text further. Although I think it would have been better to contain them to footnotes instead of placing them throughout the text of 1 Enoch. I think for the cheap price this book sells for, it is a very good introductory look at 1 Enoch.